Provide a rationale as to where in the Hierarchy of Informatics (Chapter 35, page Figure 35.6, page 608) the CHS tobacco informatics solution would be categorized.
September 10, 2019
Read the following case study and submit a 1- to 2-page essay in a Microsoft Word document using APA 6th edition in response to the questions.
September 10, 2019

MBA641 Strategic Project Management Project Feasibility Study and Timeline 2000 words

Assessment Information

Assessment Information 2
Subject Code: MBA641
Subject Name: Strategic Project Management
Assessment Title:
Length:
Assessment 2 – Project Feasibility Study and Timeline
2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range)
Weighting: 40%
Total Marks:
Submission:
40
Online via Turnitin + Additional files
Due Date: Monday Week 8, 23.55 (AEST)
.
Your task
You are required to read the following case study and prepare a Project Feasibility Study
and Timeline based on the information contained in the case study.
Assessment Description
.
This assessment is a case study regarding a Residential Duplex Development Project. In this
case study you own a real estate development business with cash reserves for funding
development projects of $800,000. Your current business project is to successfully complete,
within a nine-month timeframe, a small residential development in a regional centre (a place
that is not a suburb in a capital city) in the state in which you reside.
This will require you to locate:
1. A regional centre in your state with a growing population that currently has more than
10,000 residents;
2. A block of land for sale that is large enough to construct a duplex (two attached
residences) based on the minimum land allotment size prescribed by the local council
and that is selling for a price you can afford;
3. A builder that will construct a duplex on your chosen block of land for a price you can
afford.
Your primary objective is to create as much equity as possible (value of your constructed
duplex less all project costs) and as much income as possible (rent collected from tenanted
duplex less all holding costs).
Your assessment task is to prepare and submit a Project Feasibility Study and Project
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968
(‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you
may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services.
Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Timeline. Templates for both of these will be made available to you but you are welcome to
modify them or use your own templates if you wish. You are expected to source real statistics
and information rather than providing estimates. This can be achieved by conducting internet
research of relevant websites and emailing or telephoning relevant people and organisations.
You will also be required to prepare an explanation supported by evidence of where you
sourced each item of information in your assessment submission from. How you do this is
entirely up to you.
You may prepare a separate report based on each of the headings in the project feasibility
study
or
You may include the information in your project feasibility study and project timeline as an
appendix.
Your explanation report cannot exceed 2,000 words and it must also include:
• Constraints and goals
• Macro-environment business drivers (such as economic, competitive, resourcing and
• demographic factors taken into account when determining feasibility)
• Micro-environment business drivers (such as technical /internal expertise, time pressures,
and other people-related considerations)
Assessment Submission
This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ or ‘PDF’ document to avoid any technical issues that
may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered
as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file.
In this case, you must contact your lecturer via email and provide a brief description of the
issue and a screenshot of the Turnitin error message.
You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any
possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.
You are required to use at least 15 sources of information and use Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used.
Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan
Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968
(‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you
may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services.
Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Number of
days
Penalty
1* – 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks
available
10 – 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after
the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a
mark of zero for the assignment(s).
Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be
given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have
been returned to students
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be
considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty
For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/KBS_FORM_Assessment-Policy_MAR2018_FA.pdf
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and
consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic
Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the
point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to
the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this
information.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
MBA641 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric – Project Feasibility Timeline 40%
Marking
Criteria
NN (Fail)
0 – 49%
P (Pass)
50 – 64%
CR (Credit)
65 – 74%
DN (Distinction)
75 – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85 -100%
Marks
Project
Feasibility
Study
Project Feasibility Study
indicates a lack of
understanding of case study
information with no further
research conducted to
determine project data inputs
not provided in case study.
Project data inputs do not lie
within a plausible range.
Project Feasibility Study
indicates novice level
understanding of case study
information and further
research required to
determine project data inputs
not provided in case study.
Some project data inputs lie
within a plausible range.
Project Feasibility Study
indicates intermediate level
understanding of case study
information and further
research required to
determine project data inputs
not provided in case study.
Sufficient project data inputs
lie within a plausible range.
Project Feasibility Study
indicates advanced level
understanding of case study
information and further
research required to
determine project data inputs
not provided in case study.
Most project data inputs lie
within a plausible range.
Project Feasibility Study
indicates expert level
understanding of case study
information and further
research required to
determine project data inputs
not provided in case study. All
project data inputs lie within a
plausible range.
8
Project
Timeline
Project Timeline does not
indicate understanding of
Gantt chart principles or
scheduling concepts with
project stage timeframes and
the relationships between
project stage timeframes not
indicated.
Project Timeline indicates
novice level understanding of
Gantt chart principles and
scheduling concepts with
project stage timeframes and
the relationships between
project stage timeframes
indicated.
Project Timeline indicates
intermediate understanding of
Gantt chart principles and
scheduling concepts with
project stage timeframes and
the relationships between
project stage timeframes
indicated.
Project Timeline indicates
advanced level understanding
of Gantt chart principles and
scheduling concepts with
project stage timeframes and
the relationships between
project stage timeframes
clearly indicated.
Project Timeline indicates
expert level understanding of
Gantt chart principles and
scheduling concepts with
project stage timeframes and
the relationships between
project stage timeframes
clearly indicated.
8
Project
Results
Negative equity value and/or
negative net monthly rental
income generated by project
feasibility study
No equity value and/or no
net monthly rental
income generated by
project feasibility study
Equity value in excess of
$50,000 and/or net monthly
rental income in excess of
$250 generated by project
feasibility study
Equity value in excess of
$100,000 and/or net monthly
rental income in excess of
$750 generated by project
feasibility study
Equity value in excess of
$150,000 and/or net monthly
rental income in excess of
$1,000 generated by project
feasibility study
8
Research
and
Information
Insufficient explanation of
information sources
unsupported by evidence
demonstrating inadequate
research activity.
Sufficient explanation of
information sources
supported by evidence
demonstrating adequate
research activity including
internet research.
Ample explanation of
information sources
supported by evidence
demonstrating broad
research activity including
internet research and
consultation with relevant
people and organizations.
Comprehensive explanation
of information sources
supported by evidence
demonstrating thorough
research activity including
internet research and
consultation with relevant
people and organizations.
Detailed explanation of
information sources
supported by evidence
demonstrating extensive
research activity including
internet research and
consultation with relevant
people and organizations.
8
/32
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Marking Criteria F (FAIL)
0—49%
P (Pass)
50-64%
CR (Credit)
65-74%
DN (Distinction)
75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85 – 100%
Marks
Answer clearly and logically
presented
Serious lack of organization.
Body paragraphs do not refer
back to or relate to main
arguments. Writing is formulaic,
i.e. “in conclusion,” “another
example is….”
Writing style could be more
effective. Organization is hard to
follow; there is little progression
of ideas. Little or no transitions
between paragraphs. Need to
more effectively weave main
arguments throughout and relate
body paragraphs.
Paragraphs are generally well
organized. Better transitions
needed. The progression of ideas
could be more thoughtful.
Paragraphs relate back to main
arguments to prove argument.
Ideas & arguments are well
structured. Thoughtful
progression of ideas and details.
Sound transitions between
paragraphs. Major arguments are
effectively made.
Ideas & arguments are
effectively structured. Thoughtful
progression of ideas and details.
Excellent transitions between
paragraphs. Concluding
comments leave the reader
thinking. Major arguments are
effectively woven throughout
everybody paragraph, with ideas
always related back to main
arguments.
/2
Appropriate theory and
research used to answer
question posed
The critique does not have
appropriate structure and lacks
direction. No significant
observations made from
appropriate theory and research.
Poor writing and expression of
arguments.
Reasonable critique which
examines the relevant issues and
makes reasonable observations
made from appropriate theory
and research. Reasonable writing
and expression of arguments.
Good critique examines the
relevant issues and makes good
observations from appropriate
theory and research. Good writing
and expression of arguments.
A very good critique considered
all the relevant issues and made
important observations made
from appropriate theory and
research. Very good writing and
expression of arguments.
Fully considered all the relevant
issues and made significant
observations made from
appropriate theory and
research. Excellent writing and
expression of arguments.
/2
Correct academic writing
style used, including correct
spelling, grammar and
punctuation
Needs more sentence variety.
Little or no thought given to
diction. Tone or language is
conversational. Contains much
informal language. Uses “I” or
“you.” Contains many examples
of unclear or awkward phrasing.
Needs more sentence variety.
Attention needed with diction.
Contains informal language or
conversational tone, or uses “I” or
“you.” Unclear or awkward
sentence phrasing.
Sentence variety is adequate.
Tone is appropriate. Diction is
clear, but could be more effective.
Language is academic, and
writing is clear and effective. Very
little or no unclear or awkward
phrasing.
Sentence variety is effective and
good. Tone is appropriate and
consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is
appropriate and effective.
Language is academic. Writing is
clear, and concise.
Sentence variety is effective and
sophisticated. Tone is
appropriate and consistent.
Diction/ vocabulary is
sophisticated and effective.
Language is academic. Writing
is clear, concise, and strong.
/1
Format of answer consistent
with question requirements
and
KBS guidelines
No efforts made to follow
submission and editing, spacing,
etc requirements.
Meets most editing, spacing,
fonts, and other editing
requirements. Some
requirements not met.
Meets editing, spacing, fonts, and
other editing requirements.
Meets almost all editing,
spacing, fonts, and other
editing requirements.
Meets all editing, spacing, fonts,
and other editing requirements.
/1
In-text referencing and
reference list follows
Harvard style and
consistent with KBS
guidelines
Inappropriate referencing. Not
in-line with requirements of
Harvard style and consistent
with KBS guidelines.
Reasonably appropriate
referencing, generally in-line with
requirements of Harvard style
and consistent with KBS
guidelines.
Good referencing, largely inline
with requirements of Harvard
style and consistent with KBS
guidelines.
Very good referencing, 100%
in-line with requirements of
Harvard style and consistent
with KBS guidelines.
Excellent/appropriate
referencing, 100% in-line with
requirements of Harvard style
and consistent with KBS
guidelines.
/1
Word count is within + / –
10% of requirement
Word count is within + / – more
than 15% of requirement
Word count is within + / – 15% of
requirement
Word count is within + / – 10% of
requirement
Word count is within + / – 5% of
requirement
Word count is within + / – 0% of
requirement
/1
Comments: /8
/40

The post MBA641 Strategic Project Management Project Feasibility Study and Timeline 2000 words appeared first on mynursinghomeworks.

Source link

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post MBA641 Strategic Project Management Project Feasibility Study and Timeline 2000 words appeared first on My Nursing Homeworks.


MBA641 Strategic Project Management Project Feasibility Study and Timeline 2000 words was first posted on September 9, 2019 at 11:17 am.
©2019 "My Nursing Homeworks". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at admin@mynursinghomeworks.com

Source link

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”


MBA641 Strategic Project Management Project Feasibility Study and Timeline 2000 words was first posted on September 10, 2019 at 9:36 am.
©2019 "nursing Writers". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at admin@lawwriters.org

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

UK BEST WRITING