Topic: Peer Review 2
Peer Review 2
Points 100 Submitting a file upload File Types doc, docx, and rtf
Learning Objectives Covered
LO1: Gain practice using peer review to improve writing through constructive feedback
LO2: Work through the editing and revising steps of the writing process.
This week, you will evaluate the effectiveness of a student’s Rogerian argumentative essay. Be sure to use the guidelines of our discussion in this week’s online lecture as a standard for your evaluation.
Read the following essay demonstrating techniques of a Rogerian Argumentative Essay:
Peer Review Week 2 – RogerianArgument.pdfPreview the document
Answer the questions on this worksheet to conduct your peer evaluation. Be sure to answer each question with at least one sentence. Submit the worksheet as your assignment:
Peer Review 2- Rogerian Argument Evaluation Worksheet.docxPreview the document
File UploadGoogle Doc
Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.
Add Another File
Click here to find a file you’ve already uploaded
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Timeliness
Writing samples submitted prior to deadline to allow others to provide feedback. Substantive feedback is provided to teammate in a timely manner.
Sufficient: Own writing submitted at start of class; feedback returned by end of class.
Insufficient: Incomplete or submitted late.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Feedback
Provided meaningful feedback on content, structure, organization, clarity
Sufficient: Comments include specific suggestions to improve quality of ideas, structure, and organization, as well as note areas of weakness and opportunities for improvement.
Insufficient: Comments are superficial. Methods for improvement: use any and all resources provided in class to help with assessing other writer’s work.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Disposition
Provided all comments in a positive, encouraging, and constructive manner
Sufficient: Appropriate praise is given when identifying strengths, and constructive, encouraging feedback addresses weaknesses with alternatives that might be considered.
Insufficient: Comments are non-encouraging, and/or might be interpreted as insulting
Total Points: 100.0